1
0

webcam copy

This commit is contained in:
Aiden
2026-05-27 12:17:12 +10:00
parent c0304c575c
commit 21f0e455ee
6 changed files with 410 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -124,15 +124,25 @@ Family-00 comparison run on 2026-05-27:
-> 02 00 04 responses after 006C
```
This suggests the family-00 forms update/read back selector values but should not
be treated as equivalent to the command-5 COPY side-effect selectors unless an
LCD observation proves otherwise.
Webcam-confirmed LCD results from the same 2026-05-27 run:
```text
00 00 6D 00 00 37 -> COPY IN PROGRESS
00 00 6C 00 00 36 -> COPY COMPLETED
05 00 6D 00 00 32 -> COPY IN PROGRESS
05 00 6C 00 00 33 -> COPY COMPLETED
```
The 250 ms and 1000 ms gap variants both produced the same LCD sequence. This
means the family-00 selector/write form can reach the COPY LCD side effects, even
though its serial response rhythm is the table-readback rhythm rather than the
command-5 `01 00 02` / `02 00 04` rhythm.
Current interpretation:
- `0x006D` is a copy-start/progress-window refresh selector.
- `0x006C` is a completion/exit selector that only behaves cleanly while the copy window is live.
- The observed `00 00 6C 00 00 36` frame is copy-related, but should not be read as "COPY COMPLETED" by itself.
- The observed `00 00 6C 00 00 36` frame can display `COPY COMPLETED` when it is sent inside a live copy window, but should not be read as a stateless "show completed" command.
- The copy window is transient and timer-controlled.
- The panel does not treat `0x006C` as a stateless "show completed" command.