run 26
This commit is contained in:
@@ -285,6 +285,11 @@ Current caution:
|
||||
`A0`, `EC` fell back to `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`.
|
||||
- Exact and host-shaped handling of `07 80 FB 50 26 50` did not yield a stable
|
||||
next-stage response.
|
||||
- Follow-up context tests suggest `A0` matters beyond `EC`:
|
||||
without `A0`, both `E8` and `E9` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED` instead of
|
||||
opening their known `7A` branches.
|
||||
- At the same time, `A0` is not sufficient to make every branch deterministic:
|
||||
a later `A0 -> E9` control repeat returned heartbeat only.
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Know
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -322,8 +327,8 @@ Current caution:
|
||||
- Overall, the evidence is getting stronger for selector-like host entries that
|
||||
open related response families, but weaker for a fully reproducible multi-turn
|
||||
"conversation" state.
|
||||
- At least on the `EC` branch, `A0` now looks more like part of the selection
|
||||
context than a purely generic primer.
|
||||
- `A0` now looks more like part of the selection context than a purely generic
|
||||
primer, but its effect is branch-dependent and not fully deterministic.
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Do Not Know
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user