run 26
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5554,3 +5554,88 @@ Best current `EC` model:
|
||||
- without `A0`, `EC` falls back toward heartbeat-family behavior
|
||||
- This is closer to a controlled state map than where we started, but it is
|
||||
still not a stable multi-turn "conversation" ladder.
|
||||
|
||||
### HE23: Does `A0` Also Context `E8` And `E9`?
|
||||
|
||||
The `EC` branch now strongly suggests that leading `A0` is part of branch
|
||||
selection context rather than just a neutral primer. These tests ask whether the
|
||||
same is true for `E8` and `E9`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### HE23a: `E8` Without Leading `A0`
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 E8 40 30 C2" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-e8-no-a0.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### HE23b: `E9` Without Leading `A0`
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 E9 40 30 C3" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-e9-no-a0.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### HE23c: `A0` Then `E8` Control Repeat
|
||||
|
||||
This is just the known-good comparison run so the no-`A0` tests can be read
|
||||
against a fresh control captured in the same phase of work.
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 E8 40 30 C2" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-e8-with-a0-control.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### HE23d: `A0` Then `E9` Control Repeat
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 E9 40 30 C3" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-e9-with-a0-control.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
What would count as a hit:
|
||||
|
||||
- `E8` or `E9` without `A0` still producing their known branches:
|
||||
- `07 80 7A 50 26 D1`
|
||||
- `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`
|
||||
- `E8` or `E9` without `A0` collapsing into heartbeat-family transients like
|
||||
`07 80 40 40 30 ED` or `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`
|
||||
- a clear difference between no-`A0` and with-`A0` controls that would promote
|
||||
`A0` from "possible primer" to "general selector context"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 `A0` Context Test For `E8` / `E9`
|
||||
|
||||
Captures:
|
||||
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-e8-no-a0.txt`
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-e9-no-a0.txt`
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-e8-with-a0-control.txt`
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-e9-with-a0-control.txt`
|
||||
|
||||
Observed outcomes:
|
||||
|
||||
| Setup | Group-1 result |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `E8` without `A0` | later heartbeat provoked `07 80 40 40 30 ED` |
|
||||
| `E9` without `A0` | later heartbeat provoked `07 80 40 40 30 ED` |
|
||||
| `A0 -> E8` control | `07 80 7A 50 26 D1` |
|
||||
| `A0 -> E9` control | heartbeat only in this repeat |
|
||||
|
||||
Interpretation:
|
||||
|
||||
- `E8` now clearly matches the `EC` pattern in one important way:
|
||||
without leading `A0`, it falls back into heartbeat-family behavior instead of
|
||||
opening its `7A` branch.
|
||||
- `E9` without `A0` also fell back to the same heartbeat-family transient
|
||||
`07 80 40 40 30 ED`.
|
||||
- So `A0` is now more plausibly a broader selector-context opener, not just an
|
||||
`EC`-specific quirk.
|
||||
- However, `A0` is **not** sufficient to make every selector deterministic:
|
||||
the `A0 -> E9` control repeat produced only heartbeat in this run, even though
|
||||
earlier `A0 -> E9` work did produce `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`.
|
||||
|
||||
Best current read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `A0` looks necessary or at least strongly supportive for entering the `E8`
|
||||
and `EC` family spaces.
|
||||
- `E9` remains more timing- or state-sensitive than `E8`; `A0` helps define the
|
||||
context, but does not guarantee the `7A 28 D3` branch on every clean repeat.
|
||||
- This strengthens the state-map model:
|
||||
- no `A0` -> selector values tend to collapse into heartbeat-family
|
||||
transients
|
||||
- with `A0` -> some selector values can open structured family spaces
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -285,6 +285,11 @@ Current caution:
|
||||
`A0`, `EC` fell back to `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`.
|
||||
- Exact and host-shaped handling of `07 80 FB 50 26 50` did not yield a stable
|
||||
next-stage response.
|
||||
- Follow-up context tests suggest `A0` matters beyond `EC`:
|
||||
without `A0`, both `E8` and `E9` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED` instead of
|
||||
opening their known `7A` branches.
|
||||
- At the same time, `A0` is not sufficient to make every branch deterministic:
|
||||
a later `A0 -> E9` control repeat returned heartbeat only.
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Know
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -322,8 +327,8 @@ Current caution:
|
||||
- Overall, the evidence is getting stronger for selector-like host entries that
|
||||
open related response families, but weaker for a fully reproducible multi-turn
|
||||
"conversation" state.
|
||||
- At least on the `EC` branch, `A0` now looks more like part of the selection
|
||||
context than a purely generic primer.
|
||||
- `A0` now looks more like part of the selection context than a purely generic
|
||||
primer, but its effect is branch-dependent and not fully deterministic.
|
||||
|
||||
## What We Do Not Know
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -126,15 +126,25 @@ different downstream response families.
|
||||
### S4: `A0`-Contexted Selector Space
|
||||
|
||||
Current best evidence says `A0` is not always just a neutral primer. On at
|
||||
least the `EC` branch, it appears to be part of the context that opens the
|
||||
family space.
|
||||
least the `EC` and `E8` branches, it appears to be part of the context that
|
||||
opens the family space.
|
||||
|
||||
Observed:
|
||||
|
||||
- `A0 + E8` can produce `7A 50 26` family output
|
||||
- `A0 + EC` tends to produce `7B`-family output
|
||||
- `E8` without `A0` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
|
||||
- `E9` without `A0` also fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
|
||||
- `EC` without leading `A0` falls back to `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence: medium-high
|
||||
Nuance:
|
||||
|
||||
- `A0` is not sufficient to make every selector deterministic.
|
||||
- A later control repeat of `A0 + E9` produced heartbeat only, even though
|
||||
earlier `A0 + E9` runs produced `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`.
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence: high that `A0` is contextual; medium on the exact scope of that
|
||||
context.
|
||||
|
||||
## `Ex` Selector Neighborhood
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -198,12 +208,16 @@ What we know:
|
||||
|
||||
- reproducible in group 1
|
||||
- exact and host-shaped replies to `7A 28 D3 5C` did not advance state
|
||||
- without `A0`, `E9` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
|
||||
- with `A0`, a later control repeat returned only heartbeat, so this branch is
|
||||
less deterministic than `E8`
|
||||
|
||||
Read:
|
||||
|
||||
- `E9` looks like a sibling selector to `E8`
|
||||
- payload differences may represent page/class selection rather than random
|
||||
drift
|
||||
- `E9` appears more timing- or state-sensitive than `E8`
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence: medium
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user