run 24
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5294,3 +5294,71 @@ Best current follow-up:
|
||||
- treat `EC` as the next strong lead and test exact/host-shaped handling of
|
||||
`07 80 7B 50 26 D0`
|
||||
- optionally try `ED` next to see whether the `7B` branch continues
|
||||
|
||||
### HE16: Exact Echo Of `07 80 7B 50 26 D0`
|
||||
|
||||
Recreate the `EC` selector path, then immediately send the exact `7B`-family
|
||||
response back to the panel.
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 EC 40 30 C6" --frame "07 80 7B 50 26 D0" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-echo-exact-7b5026d0.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### HE17: Host-Shaped Mirror Of `07 80 7B 50 26 D0`
|
||||
|
||||
Host-shaped checksum for `00 00 7B 50 26 ??` is `57`.
|
||||
|
||||
```powershell
|
||||
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 EC 40 30 C6" --frame "00 00 7B 50 26 57" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-echo-host-7b5026.txt
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
What would count as a hit:
|
||||
|
||||
- any non-heartbeat response after the exact or host-shaped `7B 50 26` frame
|
||||
- a repeat of `07 80 7B 50 26 D0`
|
||||
- crossover into the `7A`-family branches or any new sibling family
|
||||
- any sign that `EC` is a second-stage exchange rather than just another
|
||||
selector-produced readable response
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 `EC` Mirror Result
|
||||
|
||||
Captures:
|
||||
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-echo-exact-7b5026d0.txt`
|
||||
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-echo-host-7b5026.txt`
|
||||
|
||||
Result summary:
|
||||
|
||||
- `EC` did not behave exactly like the earlier `E8` / `E9` branches.
|
||||
- In the host-shaped mirror run:
|
||||
- `00 00 EC 40 30 C6` reproduced `07 80 7B 50 26 D0` in group 1
|
||||
- host-shaped mirror `00 00 7B 50 26 57` did not advance the exchange; it
|
||||
only drained one more `07 80 7B 50 26 D0` and then returned to heartbeat
|
||||
- In the exact-echo run:
|
||||
- the `EC` selector step itself did not expose the `7B` family inside the
|
||||
immediate read window
|
||||
- but exact echo `07 80 7B 50 26 D0` produced a fresh new family:
|
||||
`07 C0 2F 95 09 2E`
|
||||
- that new family appeared twice in group 1, then the run returned to
|
||||
heartbeat
|
||||
- Group 2 was heartbeat-only in both runs.
|
||||
|
||||
Interpretation:
|
||||
|
||||
- `EC` is the first `Ex` selector case so far where the exact downstream echo
|
||||
appears to matter more than the host-shaped mirror.
|
||||
- That makes the `7B` branch more interesting than the `7A` branches:
|
||||
- `E8` / `E9` downstream `7A` echoes did not produce a clean second-stage
|
||||
family
|
||||
- exact `7B` echo produced `07 C0 2F 95 09 2E`
|
||||
- `07 C0 2F 95 09 2E` is now a strong follow-up target. It may be:
|
||||
- a second-stage response
|
||||
- a different page/family reached through exact `7B` echo
|
||||
- or a context-specific branch member that only appears on the exact-echo
|
||||
path
|
||||
|
||||
Best current follow-up:
|
||||
|
||||
- test exact and host-shaped handling of `07 C0 2F 95 09 2E`
|
||||
- optionally compare whether exact `EC -> 7B` echo is timing-sensitive, since
|
||||
the host-shaped mirror path did not reach the same family
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user