run 3
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,6 +28,33 @@ The current evidence suggests the panel behavior is shaped by several layers:
|
||||
|
||||
We have good evidence for layers 1-4. Layer 5 is still missing.
|
||||
|
||||
## Probable System-Level Flow
|
||||
|
||||
At the system level, the best current model is:
|
||||
|
||||
1. startup / identity / mode traffic
|
||||
2. maintained background status scan
|
||||
3. selector/detail pages layered onto that background
|
||||
4. operator events flowing back upstream
|
||||
5. unknown final condition that makes the panel fully active
|
||||
|
||||
This is less like a tiny request/ack protocol and more like a multiplexed
|
||||
camera-state bus with a control return path.
|
||||
|
||||
Working split:
|
||||
|
||||
- **CCU side** probably holds the richer master camera/session state lattice
|
||||
- **RCP side** probably behaves like a smart terminal that:
|
||||
- caches a smaller local state
|
||||
- displays received camera/session values
|
||||
- sends button/control events back upstream
|
||||
|
||||
That model fits the manuals unusually well:
|
||||
|
||||
- LCD/status content such as filter, extender, and self-diagnosis data
|
||||
- semi-awake behavior under recurring host traffic
|
||||
- broad structured command/slot lattices under several payload surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
## Baseline States
|
||||
|
||||
### S0: Idle / Not Active
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user