This commit is contained in:
Aiden
2026-05-13 19:23:20 +10:00
parent 3f90a68420
commit 29b14691ea
5 changed files with 173 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -5066,3 +5066,83 @@ Best current model of the `E8` branch:
branch.
- `07 80 FA 50 26 51` and `07 C0 7A 50 A6 11` remain side-family observations,
but neither has overtaken `7A` as the strongest lead.
### HE12: Nearby Host-Shaped `E8` Neighbors
Test whether the `7A` branch is specific to `E8`, or whether nearby host-shaped
commands in the same region also provoke structured responses.
Checksums:
- `00 00 E7 40 30 CD`
- `00 00 E9 40 30 C3`
- `00 00 EA 40 30 C0`
#### HE12a: Host-Shaped `E7`
```powershell
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 E7 40 30 CD" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-e7.txt
```
#### HE12b: Host-Shaped `E9`
```powershell
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 E9 40 30 C3" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-e9.txt
```
#### HE12c: Host-Shaped `EA`
```powershell
python scripts/serial_sequence_probe.py --port COM5 --prompt --frame "00 00 A0 00 80 7A" --frame "00 00 EA 40 30 C0" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --frame "00 00 00 00 80 DA" --repeat 2 --frame-interval 0.20 --read-after-frame 0.30 --read-after-group 0.8 --log captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-ea.txt
```
What would count as a hit:
- any non-heartbeat response after `E7`, `E9`, or `EA`
- recurrence of `07 80 7A 50 26 D1`
- recurrence of `07 80 FA 50 26 51` or `07 C0 7A 50 A6 11`
- any new stable family that suggests `E8` belongs to a broader selector block
### 2026-05-13 `E8` Neighbor Result
Captures:
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-e7.txt`
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-e9.txt`
- `captures/rcp-heartbeat-neighbor-ea.txt`
Result summary:
- `E7`, `E9`, and `EA` do not behave the same way, so this is not a simple
"everything around `E8` lands in the same branch" region.
- All three effects only appeared in group 1. Group 2 was heartbeat-only in
every run.
Observed outputs:
| Host step | Structured result |
| --- | --- |
| `00 00 E7 40 30 CD` | later heartbeat provoked `07 80 40 40 30 ED` |
| `00 00 E9 40 30 C3` | produced `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C` |
| `00 00 EA 40 30 C0` | later heartbeat provoked `07 80 C0 40 30 6D` |
Interpretation:
- `E8` still appears special, because it is the one that most cleanly enters the
reproducible `07 80 7A 50 26 D1` branch.
- `E9` is the first nearby neighbor to produce a clearly related but distinct
`7A`-family frame:
- `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`
- `E7` and `EA` look more like they bias the panel toward known heartbeat-family
transients (`07 80 40 40 30 ED` and `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`) rather than the
`7A` / `FA` branch.
- So the emerging picture is not a broad contiguous "E* equals same page"
block, but a mixed neighborhood where nearby host-shaped values steer the
panel into different transient/readable families.
Best current follow-up:
- treat `E9` as the strongest neighbor lead
- test exact and host-shaped handling of `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`
- optionally compare `E8` vs `E9` timing to see whether the differing `7A`
payloads reflect selector choice or timing/context