This commit is contained in:
Aiden
2026-05-13 20:11:56 +10:00
parent c1b03df27f
commit 0394dc03be
12 changed files with 451 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -123,28 +123,37 @@ The strongest current "state map" behavior lives here. Certain host-side values
look less like direct commands and more like selector/context entries that open
different downstream response families.
### S4: `A0`-Contexted Selector Space
### S4: Context-Opened Selector Space
Current best evidence says `A0` is not always just a neutral primer. On at
least the `EC` and `E8` branches, it appears to be part of the context that
opens the family space.
Current best evidence says the selector surface is opened not by a single magic
byte, but by a small family of host-side context setters.
Observed:
- `A0 + E8` can produce `7A 50 26` family output
- `A0 + EC` tends to produce `7B`-family output
- `E8` without `A0` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
- `E9` without `A0` also fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
- `EC` without leading `A0` falls back to `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`
- `90 + E8` produced `7A 50 26`
- `90 + E9` produced `7A 28 D3`
- `90 + EC` produced `7B 50 26`
- `AF + E9` produced `7A 28 D3`
- `AF + EC` produced `7B 50 26`
- `AF + E8` produced the sibling `FA 50 26` family
- bare heartbeat + `E8` produced `7A 50 26`
- bare heartbeat + `E9` produced `7A 28 D3`
- bare heartbeat + `EC` did not open `7B`; it stayed in heartbeat-family
behavior
Nuance:
- `A0` is not the only opener.
- `A0` is not sufficient to make every selector deterministic.
- A later control repeat of `A0 + E9` produced heartbeat only, even though
earlier `A0 + E9` runs produced `07 80 7A 28 D3 5C`.
- `EC` appears stricter than `E8/E9`, because heartbeat alone was enough for
`E8/E9` but not for `EC`.
Confidence: high that `A0` is contextual; medium on the exact scope of that
context.
Confidence: high that a context-opener family exists; medium-high on the exact
rules for each selector.
## `Ex` Selector Neighborhood
@@ -185,12 +194,18 @@ What we know:
- reproducible in group 1
- exact echo of `07 80 7A 50 26 D1` did not advance state
- host-shaped mirror of `7A 50 26` did not advance state
- opened by more than one context:
- `A0`
- `90`
- bare heartbeat
- `AF` shifted this branch to sibling `FA 50 26 51`
Read:
- `E8` is the active selector
- `7A 50 26 D1` is a downstream family response, not yet a meaningful next host
turn
- context affects which sibling family `E8` opens
Confidence: medium-high
@@ -211,6 +226,10 @@ What we know:
- without `A0`, `E9` fell back to `07 80 40 40 30 ED`
- with `A0`, a later control repeat returned only heartbeat, so this branch is
less deterministic than `E8`
- also opened by:
- `90`
- `AF`
- bare heartbeat
Read:
@@ -236,6 +255,8 @@ or
Important details:
- without leading `A0`, `EC` fell back to `07 80 C0 40 30 6D`
- `90` and `AF` also opened `7B 50 26`
- bare heartbeat alone did not
- short and long spacing with `A0` still favored `07 80 7B 50 26 D0`
- exact `7B` echo once produced:
- `07 C0 2F 95 09 2E`
@@ -245,7 +266,7 @@ Important details:
Read:
- `EC` is the most stateful selector branch seen so far
- `A0` seems to be part of its selection context
- `EC` needs a stronger context class than plain heartbeat
- `7B` is the most stable downstream family on this branch
- `FB` is real but currently looks like a sibling observation, not a clear reply
target
@@ -262,9 +283,9 @@ S1 host-present/cadence-held
S2 discovery/query window
-> selector/context entry
S4 A0-contexted selector space
-> E8 -> B1 (7A 50 26 family)
-> E8 -> B1 (7A / FA family space)
-> E9 -> B2 (7A 28 D3 family)
-> EC -> B3 (7B / FB family)
-> EC -> B3 (7B / FB family space)
-> E6/E7/EB -> heartbeat-family transient
-> EA / no-A0-EC -> C0-family transient
```